The 2017 revised Shareholder Rights Directive gives shareholders a say on executive pay and requires institutional investors to improve shareholder engagement. The directive is thus designed to provide a counterweight to the increasingly dominant ‘shareholder’ model of corporate governance which has put the interests of firms’ shareholders ahead of other stakeholders, including their workers.  Drawing on the experience of the UK, Europe’s leading exponent of the shareholder model whose experience heavily influenced the Commission’s thinking, this brief analyses the workings of the directive, discusses its implications for worker’s rights and suggests how trade unions should respond.

A frequent criticism of institutional investors, such as mutual and pension funds, is their passivity in influencing the companies they invest in despite the power of exit they hold over them. This has been blamed for short-termism, undermining the trust of workers and fueling excessive executive pay. The directive tries to address these problems by increasing transparency and engagement, and requiring investors to show how their portfolios conform to their long-term investment strategies. Although the directive sets no cap on executive pay it provides shareholders with more control over company policies that include pay. The brief critically examines the effectiveness of these policies, arguing that these do not go far enough and may even be unworkable. The advice for trade unions is to continue pushing on issues such as boardroom pay, particularly the notion that it should be set according to the firm’s share price.           

Table of contents

Full text

Related content

Jan Cremers, Sigurt Vitols

Takeovers with or without worker voice: workers’ rights under the EU Takeover Bids Directive

This book presents the results of a study of workers’ rights during company takeover situations in Europe. Takeovers are extremely important for workers because a change in ownership frequently leads to restructuring in the firm, including replacement of management, changed working conditions, increased work intensity and/or mass redundancies. It... Find out more

Revision of the Carcinogens Directive: anything happening?

The key law that protects workers against carcinogens in the workplace has been under revision for close on a decade. The process has long been stymied by disagreements over extending occupational exposure limits and the scope of the law to substances harmful to reproductive health. Latterly, there has been some movement on exposure limits. An... Find out more

Séverine Picard

Revising the Working Time Directive. A long and winding road

In November 2011, the European social partners notified the European Commission of their plans to start negotiating on working time. They have set a deadline of September 2012 to agree on a revision of the Working Time Directive after an unfruitful five years of discussions by the European institutions. The rocky road travelled shows the enormity... Find out more

Ulrich Bamberg, Stefano Boy

The new Machinery Directive. A tool to uncover the changes introduced by the revised directive

The new Machinery Directive adopted in 2006 came into effect on 29 December 2009. It is a particularly complex piece of legislation that needs a route map through it in order to be implemented with proper regard for workers' safety. ETUI expert Stefano Boy analyses the new law's requirements on the health and safety of users, and identifies where... Find out more