This Working Paper tackles two questions: what counts as work within a deregulated labour market; and what are the implications for the study of precariousness? The paper addresses the traditional dichotomy between paid and unpaid work which obscures how unpaid activities often undercut paid employment. In this light, it suggests a new way of understanding precariousness which can help trade unions to understand it and tackle its increasingly prevalence.  

Buy printed version
€ 25.00
en

Table of contents

Full text

Related content

Myths of employment deregulation: how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation

This book looks at the effects of changes in employment regulation on levels and forms of employment in nine EU countries (Spain, Italy, Estonia, Slovakia, Poland, Germany, France, Denmark, and the UK). It demonstrates that reducing employment protection has brought neither labour market nor economic benefits. Moreover, post-crisis changes were... Find out more

Unemployment, internal devaluation and labour market deregulation in Europe

Unemployment rates in the EU rose after the economic crisis of 2008, passing 10% in 2012, but with big variations between countries. The worst afflicted had been subject to so-called policies of internal devaluation, aimed at curing unemployment by reducing wage costs. This book provides a comparative study of countries that to varying degrees... Find out more

Jill Rubery, Agnieszka Piasna

Labour market segmentation and the EU reform agenda: developing alternatives to the mainstream

European employment regulation has been repeatedly identified by policymakers as too stringent resulting in policy recommendations aimed at a more flexible labour market. This diagnosis has been reaffirmed, particularly by international policymakers, in the post-2008 economic and jobs crisis with high employment protection regarded as harmful for... Find out more